Lib Dem peer raises threat to local school in Great Cornard.

9.00.00am BST (GMT +0100) Mon 28th Jun 2010

Lord Phillips of Sudbury raised in the House of Lords debate the threat to Great Cornard Upper School of the Conservative policy of Free schools. Below is the speech:

Mr Michael Gove, Secretaty of State for Education, said at the beginning of his speech that we are,

"dedicated to ensuring that every child has a better start in life"

Later, he said:

"We have-we have been bequeathed-one of the most stratified and segregated school systems in the developed world ... That is why we are pressing ahead with the sort of changes that will drive improvement across the whole of the state school system"

That is my concern. Unless the new schools are constrained by the addition of characteristics to Clause 1(6) to make sure that this danger will not occur, there is a real prospect that they will do the very thing that the Secretary of State and the Minister in this place said that they were committed to preventing-that is, widening the gap between the best schools and the worst schools, to put it crudely.

The particular danger is that the new schools will siphon off pupils from the more middle-class families, leaving existing schools with a depleted intake. I spent this morning in my native town of Sudbury in Suffolk, which is an absolutely typical English market town. It currently has two secondary schools serving 25 or 30 villages. I was told by the excellent head and the chair of governors of one of the two, Cornard Upper School -my wife is a governor of the same school-that its position under the Bill could be made extraordinarily difficult. I am absolutely sure that that would be inadvertent, but our job is to guard against inadvertence. The key school in its present catchment area is proposing to set up as a new school.

There are three principal damaging effects of that probability. First, it will unbalance the existing intake of the school. The head, Michael Foley, put it like this:

"All I can tell you is that in this area, the formation of a free school in one of the surrounding villages would lead to segregation by default. The existing fully comprehensive school, which has allowed children from all backgrounds to flourish ... would be replaced by two schools in stark contrast: one with a largely privileged intake and the other largely populated by children living in challenging circumstances".

It is a commonplace that in the past 20 or 30 years villages around cities and towns have become gentrified.

Then there is the massive cost of creating a new school. The local authority reckon that it will cost £4 million just to uprate the buildings of this feeder school to enable it to gain new independent status at a time when Cornard desperately needs to modernise its existing buildings as 10 classrooms leak when it rains. It is fruitless to pretend that the capital expenditure on these new schools will not affect the budgets and incomes of the existing maintained schools.

There is a third potential problem with the new schools, unless we guard against it. Cornard school will lose 40 per cent of its intake. That will create real viability problems with huge cuts in staff, massive disruption and consequent denting of morale in a school which this year has received a certificate from the Specialist Schools and Academies Trust stating that it is one of the most improved schools in Suffolk. The LEA in Suffolk noted that it had achieved the greatest added value over the past year. The Ofsted report stated that it was "a good school". It continued:

"The quality of care, guidance and support that is provided for students is outstanding. The school has gone from strength to strength since the previous inspection".

I urge the Government to include a further characteristic in Clause 1(6) along the lines that a new school can be established and maintained only where, on balance, it will improve education not only for its own pupils but for those of adjacent schools.